Priced for the supplier, not the procurement department
The underlying notices are free and public. What you are paying for is not having to read nine thousand of them a week. So it is priced like a tool, not like enterprise data.
Free
€0forever
Find out whether the public sector buys what you sell.
- One matching profile
- Up to 5 matches per digest
- Weekly or daily digest
- All six sources
- Deterministic relevance scoring
- AI relevance reranking
- Instant alerts
- CSV and API access
Most popular
Solo
€29per month
For one bid writer who cannot afford to miss a deadline.
- Three matching profiles
- Unlimited matches per digest
- Alerts as notices land, not once a day
- AI relevance reranking with a written reason per match
- Exclude-term tuning
- CSV export
- Shared team inbox
- API access
Team
€99per month
For a bid team covering several trades or regions.
- Fifteen matching profiles
- Everything in Solo
- Route different profiles to different recipients
- JSON API and webhooks
- Full historical archive search
- Priority source coverage requests
What everyone else charges for public data
These are published list prices from vendors reselling government feeds that are free to access. The gap is the opportunity.
| Vendor | List price | Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| Tenders Direct | £1,359 – £2,319 / year | UK only |
| BillTrack50 | $1,000 / state / year | US legislation |
| Cause IQ | $349 / month | IRS 990 data |
| Shovels.ai | $599 – $999 / month | US permits |
| Bid Banana | $49.99 / month | US RFPs |
| Tendercast | €0 – €99 / month | EU, UK, US, Canada, World Bank |
Honest limitations
- Coverage is the six sources listed on the sources page. It is not every sub-national portal, and it never claims to be.
- Some feeds publish only summary fields for a notice. Where a description is missing we say so rather than inventing one.
- A relevance score is a ranking aid, not a bid/no-bid decision. The official notice is always the authority.